TOP O's
ATS winners:
1st set - [ SU/ATS ]
JAC (-7, vs HOU), - win/lose
CHI (+3, vs PHI), - win/win
KC (+9, vs DEN), - win/win
CIN (-3.5, vs CLE) - lose/lose
2nd set -
SD (-7.5, @OAK) , win/win
PIT (-7, vs BAL) win/loss
ATS LOSERS:
1st set - [ SU/ATS ]
ATL (+7, @CAR), lose/lose
NO (-6, vs SF) win/win
2nd set -
ARI (+2.5, @NYJ), lose/lose
WAS (+11, @DAL), win/win
GB (+2, @TB), lose/lose
PHI (-3, @CHI) lose/lose
it seems there is a trend to follow or perhaps I'm seeing too much of what I want to see, but TOP O's ATS winners produces more winners and ATS losers produces more losers.
TOP D's
ATS WINNERS:
1st set - [ SU/ATS ]
PHI (-3, @CHI), lose/lose
MIN? (+3, @TEN), lose/lose
STL? (+8, vsBUF), lose/lose
CLE? (+3.5, @CIN) win/win
2nd set -
OAK (+7.5, vsSD), lose/lose
TB (-2, vsGB) win/win
ATS LOSERS:
1st set - [ SU/ATS ]
DEN (-9, @KC), lose/lose
SD (-7.5, @OAK) win/win
2nd set -
GB (+2, @TB), lose/lose
NYJ (-2.5, vsARI), win/win
CHI (+3, vsPHI), win/win
CIN (-3.5, vsCLE), lose/lose
JAC (-7.5, vsHOU), win/lose
WAS (+11, @DAL) win/win
odd but TOP D's ATS winners produces more losers and ATS losers produces 50-50 results
No comments:
Post a Comment